During a conversation at SBL,
a former professor of mine mentioned that we, as Reformed scholars,
would eventually have to choose between serving the church or the
academy. By that, I assume he means that one cannot please both academia
and the church at the same time – whatever we write, one side will be
frustrated or disappointed by the choices we make. However, I’m not sure
I want to choose between church or the academy, although perhaps I have
already unwittingly made my choice.
My choice to skip part of the sessions on Sunday morning to attend church in the neighbourhood illustrates my preference before church above academy. My time living in intentional community has only reaffirmed my desire
to not allow my faith to be only something for my head. So I have
definitely chosen church.
At the same time, I’m not interested in church that isn’t interested
in listening to biblical scholarship. To ignore what’s happening in
biblical scholarship is denying my Reformed heritage (this is despite
the fact that, as a friend at this conference put it, there are a lot of
people focused on a lot of obscure little details that I’m not at all
interested in). How can we believe that God rains down good on both the
wicked and righteous and then assume that other Christians (and
non-Christians) are incapable of having good insights into linguistics,
the biblical text, theology and culture?!? And since as a Reformed
Christian I believe in God’s sovereignty and capability of working
amongst all people in all things, how can I not use the gifts God’s
given me to participate in developing that knowledge further? And then
sharing that knowledge with the wider body of Christ (the church).
I, being typical of the generation in which I belong, want both. This
conference has reminded me that I’m not the only one, which is pretty
exciting. Now just to figure out how best to do that well (and finish my
dissertation )
Part of this has been cross-posted at brendasbiblioblog.wordpress.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment