21 January 2006

Being female in Seminary

It was inevitable that this would come up. So I thought I’d do a pre-emptive strike. I’m female. I go to Seminary. That’s unusual, especially in small conservative Reformed denominations. Most of my classes are about 10% female. And some of them have fewer than ten people. Every so often I feel the need to introduce myself as the ‘token female.’

And sometimes it is annoying. I don’t want to represent the entire female population. Half of the time I don’t know how to speak about my feelings on as issue, so how can I speak for everyone else? And as far as social events, they can be awkward. Do I hang out with the guys and talk theology or do I hang out with their significant others and talk girl stuff (which is problematic because i know little about kids)? Some days I just feel forgotten – I’m not one of the guys, so I’m not invited. and even if the females do tend to look out for each other and have a common bond, can I assume that just because a female has come to Seminary she immediately would be the type of person I’d be best friends with? (and the answer is, sometimes I have been – and sometime I haven’t been.)

But most of the time, the seminary thing is good. even the female part. i've had good roommates (fellow classmates) over the years. I’m doing what I love, and i know my peers (even if sometimes they forget me socially) generally want the best for me. I shoot the breeze with the professors (a lot), and many of them have gone out of their way to encourage me and help me. And it’s kind of fun to stick out every once in awhile. And to be noticed. as long as it's not all the time.

Addendum: As much as that is all true, it doesn't quite explain everything involved with being a female at Seminary. Whether females ought to be ordained to being pastors is something the church is divided on. It's allowed but not necessary. That decision - to hold that women in office can be argued both for and against biblically - is a lot easier to understand in theory than it is to actually live out. At the Seminary we tend to ignore it as much as possible. except it's hard to be hospitable to be women studying for the ministry while also being hospitable to students who think women ought not to be there. Thus, even if we don't talk about it, the issue remains. I wrote the following article in response to an article written by a fellow student commenting that we ought to talk more about the issue.

"Must we keep talking?

I’m female. Although that fact doesn’t define me, it definitely affects how I see the world. I get tired of having too many discussions about what I think and ignoring how I feel. When the topic of abuse comes up in class, the “victims” aren’t abstract concepts, but rather women I know who aren’t all that different from me. And when the topic of women in office comes up, it seems that the answer I’d have would be obvious. Except it’s still not. I’m not convinced that the Bible says that women should be pastors and/or elders. However, I’m also not fully convinced that women are not allowed to be. And those lack of convictions have led to enough awkward painful moments over the years that I wish we would stop talking about it so much.

Just because women in office doesn’t come up in arguments in class or in the Student Center doesn’t mean it never comes up. For many of the females who are here seeking ordination, the issue comes up all too often – we live out the issue. It comes up with every thought of a future pastorate. When male students put their requests in for summer assignments, they go by location and timing. When female students put in their requests, we pray that somehow the number of churches that are okay with students of both genders will be greater than the number of female students needing places to preach. And as we try to explain the decision to go into ministry to family and friends who are hostile to women in office, the whole debate gets old and painful. Never mind the pain that too many females have lingering on them when we arrive – pain of being rejected by classes for money, of having opportunities denied, and of having to fight to be allowed to use God-given gifts and follow Him.

I struggled with whether the paragraph above was about ‘we’ or ‘they.’ I feel absolutely no call to be a Minister of the Word, so the paragraph was about those who did – them. Except I’m a female in the M. Div program, so it’s about me, too. When I receive money for being female, I worry about being merely a cause instead of a person trying to follow God faithfully. Sermon writing tears me up inside; I feel pushed into something I don’t know if I am allowed to be. When I receive comments that seem focused on how nice it will be when God enlightens everyone to see how women ought to be in office, I’m not sure whether to be mournful, hurt or angry. Am I being misunderstood or am I the one not understanding? How do we hear God rightly on this issue and still show grace to those who disagree on something that questions our ability to hear God?

And I don’t know how exactly to do that. For the sake of the females who have too long been the issue, instead of merely having to live with the questions raised by it, is it fair to ask that those against women in office be less vocal? But can you limit the voice of one side without it becoming the position held by all those ‘in the right’? The questions come down to how we can be hospitable to both sides and those of us in the middle.

Intermingled with the women in office issue is that of females being a minority at Seminary, a minority that has historically been considered the lesser sex. The gender issue, as it is intimately tied to the women in office question, needs to become part of the hospitality question, while also seeing that it raises other questions. Sexist comments made by those who are for women in office are as inappropriate as believing that being against women in office makes one a male chauvinist. But in a world that struggles with too much abuse and too much white male-bashing, sometimes it’s hard to know what’s good clean fun that reflects a healthy perspective on reality and what’s inappropriate.

Sarah Sumner, in her book Men and Women in the Church, quotes a female talking about Seminary: “’I don’t want to enter the world of theology; I’m afraid of what it might do to me. So many women in seminary are angry, and I don’t want to be like them. I wish it wasn’t like this because I lose out no matter what choice I make. If I seize the opportunity, I lose out big time by becoming embittered at Christians who refuse to accept me. If I forgot the opportunity, I lose out even more by missing god’s call on my life.’” (23-24) The issue, as much as I want it to be merely about how I feel and what I believe, is a lot more complicated and painful and unfair than I wish it were.

So maybe I’m not tired of talking about it all the time, so much as I’m tired of having to live with it. I know that being female is something to delight in, but sometimes it raises so many questions and complications that it clouds over that male and female were created in God’s image. And together we are called very good. And commanded to follow God faithfully."
It was published in the Seminary's student newspaper. Jan 16, 2006. The article is available elsewhere on the internet.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Most of the people in seminary are in a minority. Sounds like an oxymoron but it all depends on which axis is used to cut the pie. Are people as predjudiced against Canadians as women? There are many people who are quite accepting of Canadians and women and Chinese and Ugandan and old and young and heaven forbid from other denominations than the CRC. Yet any of these people could at times feel that predjudice was only for them. And doesn't it add to your reward in heaven if people hate you because of Christ? If what you're doing is about Christ before it's about one of your minority identities let them (whoever they are) think what they may. Kick the dust off of your sandals if you have to and move directly to the next opportunity.

Anonymous said...

Continued from above...1 Cor 12:14 and following...

14 Now the body is not made up of one part but of many. 15 If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 16 And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 17 If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be? 18 But in fact God has arranged the parts in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be. 19 If they were all one part, where would the body be? 20 As it is, there are many parts, but one body.
21 The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” 22 On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, 23 and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. And the parts that are unpresentable are treated with special modesty, 24 while our presentable parts need no special treatment. But God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, 25 so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. 26 If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.
27 Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it. 28 And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tonguesb? Do all interpret? 31 But eagerly desirec the greater gifts.
Love
And now I will show you the most excellent way.
13 If I speak in the tonguesa of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames,b but have not love, I gain nothing.
4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12 Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.
The Holy Bible : New International Version. 1996, c1984 . Zondervan: Grand Rapids

Brenda Kronemeijer-Heyink said...

You're right about the minority thing. We all are in some way a minority.
But the problem with females and seminary is a bit more than a minority thing (even if that fits somewhat in the discussion). If someone isn't sure whether women ought to be pastors that means that this person implicitly questions whether a woman at Seminary ought to be there. That's not to say that people aren't sure about women in office can't be hospitable to females at Seminary (they actually should be), but it makes it more complicated.
And angry reactions, even if it is considered righteous anger, against those who haven't figured out how to be faithful to their belief that women ought not to be pastors while being hospitable to females in Seminary, don't help us all learn how to deal with this situation.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your thoughtful musings on a difficult subject. As another female seminary student, I particularly resonated with your quote “’I don’t want to enter the world of theology; I’m afraid of what it might do to me. So many women in seminary are angry, and I don’t want to be like them. I wish it wasn’t like this because I lose out no matter what choice I make. If I seize the opportunity, I lose out big time by becoming embittered at Christians who refuse to accept me. If I forgot the opportunity, I lose out even more by missing god’s call on my life.’” (23-24) The issue, as much as I want it to be merely about how I feel and what I believe, is a lot more complicated and painful and unfair than I wish it were. "

It's difficult to convey the dynamics of being an anomaly to those who aren't. Difficult-but crucially honest- to admit one's thinking/praying/understanding on the women's ordination "issue" is still in process. And harder still to discern what all that means personally. I've had the interesting experience of gently refusing to become a poster girl for the pro-women's ord. group in our church-it just ain't that simple, folks...and of being a distressed bystander, while an older female deaconal candidate gradually allowed herself to be hounded out of an Apologetics class by a male student loudly proclaiming that Paul suffered not a woman to teach or have authority over men.
Sure, it would be simpler to just kick the dust off metaphorical sandals and move on. But not responsible or realistic. God places us in communities, in classrooms, in fellowships and families, all within the body of Christ, and those connections are part and parcel of His refining process.